Daily Archives: September 22, 2014

Yellowstone Plundered by Market Hunters: A look back to 1876

From the Boone and Crockett Club


Editor’s Note: With National Hunting & Fishing Day less than a week away, we’re taking a look back at a crisis at one of our earliest national parks that literally changed the face of conservation in America.


YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK (Sept. 19, 1876) – Soon on newsstands in all 38 states, an upcoming edition of “Forest and Stream” will feature a report by editor George Bird Grinnell on a poaching crisis still plaguing Yellowstone even in its fourth year as a U.S. national park.

Grinnell, back from an expedition in the area, witnessed the sad carnage and writes, “It is estimated that during the winter of 1874-1875, not less than 3,000 buffalo and mule deer suffer even more severely than the elk, and the antelope nearly as much.”

The concerned editor is urging Congress to help stop the rampant market hunting and exploitation of wildlife, timber, geysers and other natural resources of the park.

Yellowstone elk poached by Fredrick and Philip Bottler near Mammoth Hot Spring during the spring of 1875.

Yellowstone elk poached by Fredrick and Philip Bottler near Mammoth Hot Spring during the spring of 1875.


That’s how early sportsmen might have announced the launch of a long crusade that would change the course of conservation in America.

The plight of Yellowstone and the public outcry that followed Grinnell’s articles on what he called “the park grab,” proved to be a tipping point that rallied the 1887 formation of the Boone and Crockett Club. Founder Theodore Roosevelt was resolute in establishing the fledgling outfit’s first order of business: Protect the park.

Today, Boone and Crockett is commemorating the 120th anniversary of the Club’s first major success, the Yellowstone Protection Act of 1894.

“The campaign to preserve Yellowstone was the first time a natural resource issue secured the popular support of both sportsmen and non-sportsmen,” said current Boone and Crockett Club President Bill Demmer. “Yellowstone thrust Boone and Crockett into the national limelight as an organization of hunters leading America’s early conservation movement.”

The Yellowstone Protection Act was introduced and pushed through Congress by Boone and Crockett member John F. Lacey. The senator from Iowa is remembered more for his Lacey Act of 1900, which outlawed interstate commerce in wildlife and established authority for enforcement, effectively ending an era of indiscriminate slaughter through commercial market hunting. That law remains a cornerstone of conservation law. But Lacey also was an enthusiastic supporter of Yellowstone. He was disgusted by reports of market hunters savaging the park’s big-game populations.

Lacey’s 1894 act established Yellowstone as an inviolate wildlife refuge, the first in the country, and it provided for armed law enforcement. It was the first law establishing definitive national park management rules and it was also the first federal wildlife protection law. It was, and still is, considered landmark legislation.

“Although Congress and President Grant had designated Yellowstone as a national park in 1872, there were no clear laws or provisions for enforcement or prosecution for another 22 years,” explained Demmer. “Dubbed ‘America’s Playground,’ citizens had their first national park. They just didn’t know what to do with it or what that meant. Exploiters had free reign and the park’s resources remained in peril until the Yellowstone Protection Act in 1894.”

Grinnell, who would join Roosevelt in co-founding the Boone and Crockett Club, became editor of “Forest and Stream” in 1876. He used the “power of the pen” to take on commercial wildlife markets, timber barons, railroads and others who exploited the park.

Nevertheless, by 1886, poaching, vandalism, logging and theft had increased. The Northern Pacific Railroad also was plying for a new route through the heart of the park.

Another Boone and Crockett member, Gen. Philip Sheridan, who commanded U.S. military forces in the West, dispatched troops to protectYellowstone.

Sheridan also suggested expanding park boundaries to conform with seasonal migration patterns of wildlife, an idea that met heavy opposition from lawmakers who felt Yellowstone was already too big.

Politicians also were reluctant to appropriate additional funds for the park. According to Yellowstone documentarian Ken Burns, lawmakers were frustrated over “a series of inept park superintendents including one who removed an entire geyser cone for shipment to the Smithsonian and proposed that a distinctive rock formation be equipped with plumbing so it could project a column of water to any desired height.”

These were the kinds of stories that Grinnell used to enflame the public.

Roosevelt, Grinnell, Lacey and Sheridan were joined by other club members, George G. Vest, Arnold Hague, William Hallett Phillips, W.A. Wadsworth and Archibald Rogers to name a few, in pushing for the Yellowstone Protection Act.

George Bird Grinnell

George Bird Grinnell

“Even 120 later, this group effort remains a point of pride for our club. It helped protect natural resources, minerals, geothermal features and the very landscape of America’s first national park – and it galvanized America’s trust in hunters as true leaders in wildlife conservation,” said Demmer.

He added, “Sadly, for the millions of visitors to Yellowstone each year, there is not one plaque or sign acknowledging sportsmen for saving the park. Maybe someday.”

For details about the Boone and Crockett Club’s legacy in Yellowstone visit http://www.boone-crockett.org/news/news_dc.asp?area=news#205

New artwork chosen for 2015-16 Duck Stamp


Friends of the Migratory Bird/Duck Stamp

Winning artwork of a pair of Ruddy Ducks painted in acrylic by Jennifer Miller of Olean, New York

Winning artwork of a pair of Ruddy Ducks painted in acrylic by Jennifer Miller of Olean, New York

The 2014 Federal Duck Stamp Art Contest was held on Friday and Saturday, September 19 and 20, at theNationalConservationTrainingCenter in Shepherdstown, West Virginia. The five eligible species for the artwork for the 2015-2016 stamp were: Brant, Canada Goose, Northern Shoveler, Red-breasted Merganser, and Ruddy Duck. There were 186 pieces of waterfowl artwork that were eligible for the two-day contest.

This is how the artwork was distributed by species:

Brant (4.3%)

Canada Goose (28.5%)

Northern Shoveler (32.3%)

Red-breasted Merganser (15.1%)

Ruddy Duck (19.9%)

Starting Saturday morning, the five-member team of judges went through the 186 submissions to vote on which ones would be “in” or “out” for subsequent rounds of judging.

Saturday’s rounds of voting were intended to reduce the number to the top three winners, with the first place artwork to appear on the 2015-2016 stamp. For the first time ever, there was a three-way tie in the voting, and extra rounds had to be run to pick the final top three in order.

The winning artwork was of a pair of Ruddy Ducks painted in acrylic by Jennifer Miller of Olean, New York. (See her reproduced artwork above.) Coming in second was a flying Red-breasted Merganser by Ron Louque of Charlottesville,Virginia, and third was a Canada Goose by Frank Mittelstadt of Beaver Dam, Wisconsin.

You can find more on the results of the contest at the Federal Duck Stamp Office website.

Jennifer Miller, the artist for the winning image with the Ruddy Ducks has been known for her fantasy artwork, yet she is currently creating wildlife artworks, jewelry, masks, and sculpture as well.

Describing her outdoor as well as artistic interests, Miller says, “I grew up with a very vivid imagination, and couldn’t stop drawing birds and dragons. I am mostly self-taught, with no formal art education, and studied under the guidance of the natural world… I draw a lot of inspiration from the land around me! I have what others have referred to as an ‘explosive’ passion for nature and wildlife, and indeed I go out of my way daily to study, observe, and learn about my interests. I am equally happy examining a wild bird through binoculars as I am examining bits of moss growing across a fallen tree.”

You can find out more about Miller and her work on her website.

Curiously, the gender of the artists making submissions to this contest was just over 80 percent male, and just under 20 percent female. Only two other women have come in first in the contest previously: Nancy Howe in 1990 (King Eider) and Sherrie Russell Meline in 2005 (Ross’s Goose).

Miller’s artwork with her pair of Ruddy Ducks will appear on to the 2015-2016 Migratory Bird Hunting and Conservation [Duck] Stamp. Individual stamps, of course, will be sold for $15 each, with almost all the proceeds – adding up to about $24 million per year – going directly to the Migratory Bird Conservation Fund (MBCF). This funding secures vital breeding, stopover, and wintering habitats for waterfowl, other bird species, and other wildlife across the National Wildlife Refuge System.

Today, parts of 252 National Wildlife Refuges (accounting for 2.37 million acres) and over 200 Waterfowl Production Areas (with over 3.0 million acres secured) owe their existence to the stamp investments made through the MBCF.

We in the Friends Group can think of no better – and more efficient – way to support wildlife habitat than the act of buying a federal stamp. Buy this year’s stamp, and when next year’s stamp showing the two Ruddy Ducks becomes available (at the end of June 2015) buy that one, too!

It’s simple. It’s inexpensive. It’s proven.