Monthly Archives: September 2014

U.S. Committee of the North American Bird Conservation Initiative reports some gains for wetland species

A new report from the U.S. Committee of the North American Bird Conservation Initiative shows encouraging population gains for some wetland-dependent bird species. At the same time, the report’s authors warn about the future implications of the continuing loss of ephemeral or temporary wetlands in the prairies of the United States and Canada. Some species such as northern pintail and black tern, which rely heavily on ephemeral wetlands, have experienced long-term declines.

The State of the Birds 2014 reports that some wetland-dependent bird populations are at or near historic high levels, including mallards, gadwall, blue-winged teal, green-winged teal and northern shovelers, according to annual breeding bird surveys conducted in the United States and Canada.

“Many wetland bird species are doing very well,” said DU’s Chief Scientist Dr. Scott Yaich. “We can at least partially attribute this to collective wetland conservation efforts across the continent. But, two decades of unprecedented above-average rainfall in many key breeding areas are in large part responsible for duck population increases that are masking the loss of wetland habitats documented by other studies. We continue to be very concerned about the accelerating loss of wetlands in important areas for birds and what that will mean when we inevitably enter another dry period.”

The report points out that ephemeral wetlands in the U.S. Prairie Pothole Region declined by 74,340 acres between 1997 and 2009. This region is North America’s most important breeding area for waterfowl and is a top conservation priority area for Ducks Unlimited. Northern pintail populations have been declining for several decades and are currently 20 percent below their long-term average.

The State of the Birds 2014 is authored by the U.S. Committee of the North American Bird Conservation Initiative-a 23-member partnership of government agencies and organizations dedicated to advancing bird conservation. The report is based on extensive reviews of population data from long-term monitoring. It looks to birds as indicators of ecosystem health by examining population trends of species dependent on one of seven habitats: grasslands, forests, wetlands, oceans, aridlands, islands and coasts. This year’s report is also a five-year check-in on the indicators presented in the inaugural 2009 State of the Birds report.

More information is available at www.stateofthebirds.org.

National Public Lands Day, September 27

On Saturday, September 27, the National Park Service celebrates the 21st annual National Public Lands Day by providing free admission to all national parks. To learn more about National Public Lands Day, please visitwww.publiclandsday.org.

National Public Lands Day is intended to encourage shared stewardship of our nation’s public lands. It is a day designated for all of our nation’s people–individuals, families, and organizations — to pull together and help improve America’s largest natural resource–its public lands. Today it is the nation’s largest, hands-on volunteer effort to improve and enhance federal, state and local public lands around the country. Nationwide, folks will pull together in work projects that range from planting trees and collecting seeds to building bridges and cutting trails.

This and other park releases are available at http://www.nps.gov/ever/parknews/newsreleases.

Quail Initiative Habitat Tour and Dinner

Kansas Department of Wildlife, Parks, and Tourism

Landowners and others interested in improving quail habitat on their property are invited to attend a Quail Habitat Tour and free dinner scheduled for Tuesday, October 21st at Melvern Wildlife Area, Reading, Kansas. Starting at 4:30 PM, a tour of completed and active habitat projects on Melvern Wildlife Area will take place. Those interested in attending the tour will meet at the KDWPT shop on the east side of Reading. Following the tour, a free catered meal, compliments of the Neosho Valley Quail Forever and Emporia Quail and Upland Wildlife Federation chapters, will be held at the Reading city building around 6:00 pm.

Following dinner, Kansas Wildlife, Parks & Tourism (KDWPT) will update participants on the progress of the Quail Initiative Project and present information on bobwhite biology and habitat management. Local Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) personnel will also be on hand to discuss relevant cost share programs available, as well as representatives from other local conservation organizations. The evening will wrap up with a time for questions, discussion, and the opportunity to sign up for habitat planning assistance.

The Kansas Quail Initiative is an effort spearheaded by the KDWPT to implement additional funding in two areas ofEastern Kansas to improve habitat for quail and monitor the changes over the next five years. The goal is to improve quail populations by 50% in these focus areas. The area of focus area for this meeting includes the Melvern Wildlife Area and over 190,000 acres in portions of Lyon, Wabaunsee, Osage and Coffey counties. “We plan to offer 100% cost sharing for landowners in these areas to implement ‘quail friendly practices’ on their land,” according to Jim  Pitman, Kansas small game coordinator. “KDWPT has designated $100,000 each year to this effort and those dollars can be used to supplement the normal 75% cost share rate from federal habitat programs. The bottom line is that landowners in this focal area will work with biologists to plan habitat improvements for quail and cost-share payments will cover all the costs,” according to Pitman. Some of the practices eligible for cost-share funding include native grass and forbs planting, removal of invading trees from grasslands, prescribed burning, hedgerow renovation and prescribed grazing. During its first two years, the Initiative has directly impacted nearly 1,300 private land acres and 4,400 public land acres.

To learn more about this effort, call 620-342-0658 by October 15th to make your reservation for the habitat tour and/or meal. If cannot attend, but would like to know more about the initiative, call Pat Riese, District Biologist at 620-583-5049.

Yellowstone Plundered by Market Hunters: A look back to 1876

From the Boone and Crockett Club

Editor’s Note: With National Hunting & Fishing Day less than a week away, we’re taking a look back at a crisis at one of our earliest national parks that literally changed the face of conservation in America.

YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK (Sept. 19, 1876) – Soon on newsstands in all 38 states, an upcoming edition of “Forest and Stream” will feature a report by editor George Bird Grinnell on a poaching crisis still plaguing Yellowstone even in its fourth year as a U.S. national park.

Grinnell, back from an expedition in the area, witnessed the sad carnage and writes, “It is estimated that during the winter of 1874-1875, not less than 3,000 buffalo and mule deer suffer even more severely than the elk, and the antelope nearly as much.”

The concerned editor is urging Congress to help stop the rampant market hunting and exploitation of wildlife, timber, geysers and other natural resources of the park.

Yellowstone elk poached by Fredrick and Philip Bottler near Mammoth Hot Spring during the spring of 1875.

Yellowstone elk poached by Fredrick and Philip Bottler near Mammoth Hot Spring during the spring of 1875.

That’s how early sportsmen might have announced the launch of a long crusade that would change the course of conservation in America.

The plight of Yellowstone and the public outcry that followed Grinnell’s articles on what he called “the park grab,” proved to be a tipping point that rallied the 1887 formation of the Boone and Crockett Club. Founder Theodore Roosevelt was resolute in establishing the fledgling outfit’s first order of business: Protect the park.

Today, Boone and Crockett is commemorating the 120th anniversary of the Club’s first major success, the Yellowstone Protection Act of 1894.

“The campaign to preserve Yellowstone was the first time a natural resource issue secured the popular support of both sportsmen and non-sportsmen,” said current Boone and Crockett Club President Bill Demmer. “Yellowstone thrust Boone and Crockett into the national limelight as an organization of hunters leading America’s early conservation movement.”

The Yellowstone Protection Act was introduced and pushed through Congress by Boone and Crockett member John F. Lacey. The senator from Iowa is remembered more for his Lacey Act of 1900, which outlawed interstate commerce in wildlife and established authority for enforcement, effectively ending an era of indiscriminate slaughter through commercial market hunting. That law remains a cornerstone of conservation law. But Lacey also was an enthusiastic supporter of Yellowstone. He was disgusted by reports of market hunters savaging the park’s big-game populations.

Lacey’s 1894 act established Yellowstone as an inviolate wildlife refuge, the first in the country, and it provided for armed law enforcement. It was the first law establishing definitive national park management rules and it was also the first federal wildlife protection law. It was, and still is, considered landmark legislation.

“Although Congress and President Grant had designated Yellowstone as a national park in 1872, there were no clear laws or provisions for enforcement or prosecution for another 22 years,” explained Demmer. “Dubbed ‘America’s Playground,’ citizens had their first national park. They just didn’t know what to do with it or what that meant. Exploiters had free reign and the park’s resources remained in peril until the Yellowstone Protection Act in 1894.”

Grinnell, who would join Roosevelt in co-founding the Boone and Crockett Club, became editor of “Forest and Stream” in 1876. He used the “power of the pen” to take on commercial wildlife markets, timber barons, railroads and others who exploited the park.

Nevertheless, by 1886, poaching, vandalism, logging and theft had increased. The Northern Pacific Railroad also was plying for a new route through the heart of the park.

Another Boone and Crockett member, Gen. Philip Sheridan, who commanded U.S. military forces in the West, dispatched troops to protectYellowstone.

Sheridan also suggested expanding park boundaries to conform with seasonal migration patterns of wildlife, an idea that met heavy opposition from lawmakers who felt Yellowstone was already too big.

Politicians also were reluctant to appropriate additional funds for the park. According to Yellowstone documentarian Ken Burns, lawmakers were frustrated over “a series of inept park superintendents including one who removed an entire geyser cone for shipment to the Smithsonian and proposed that a distinctive rock formation be equipped with plumbing so it could project a column of water to any desired height.”

These were the kinds of stories that Grinnell used to enflame the public.

Roosevelt, Grinnell, Lacey and Sheridan were joined by other club members, George G. Vest, Arnold Hague, William Hallett Phillips, W.A. Wadsworth and Archibald Rogers to name a few, in pushing for the Yellowstone Protection Act.

George Bird Grinnell

George Bird Grinnell

“Even 120 later, this group effort remains a point of pride for our club. It helped protect natural resources, minerals, geothermal features and the very landscape of America’s first national park – and it galvanized America’s trust in hunters as true leaders in wildlife conservation,” said Demmer.

He added, “Sadly, for the millions of visitors to Yellowstone each year, there is not one plaque or sign acknowledging sportsmen for saving the park. Maybe someday.”

For details about the Boone and Crockett Club’s legacy in Yellowstone visit http://www.boone-crockett.org/news/news_dc.asp?area=news#205

New artwork chosen for 2015-16 Duck Stamp

From WINGTIPS

Friends of the Migratory Bird/Duck Stamp

Winning artwork of a pair of Ruddy Ducks painted in acrylic by Jennifer Miller of Olean, New York

Winning artwork of a pair of Ruddy Ducks painted in acrylic by Jennifer Miller of Olean, New York

The 2014 Federal Duck Stamp Art Contest was held on Friday and Saturday, September 19 and 20, at theNationalConservationTrainingCenter in Shepherdstown, West Virginia. The five eligible species for the artwork for the 2015-2016 stamp were: Brant, Canada Goose, Northern Shoveler, Red-breasted Merganser, and Ruddy Duck. There were 186 pieces of waterfowl artwork that were eligible for the two-day contest.

This is how the artwork was distributed by species:

Brant (4.3%)

Canada Goose (28.5%)

Northern Shoveler (32.3%)

Red-breasted Merganser (15.1%)

Ruddy Duck (19.9%)

Starting Saturday morning, the five-member team of judges went through the 186 submissions to vote on which ones would be “in” or “out” for subsequent rounds of judging.

Saturday’s rounds of voting were intended to reduce the number to the top three winners, with the first place artwork to appear on the 2015-2016 stamp. For the first time ever, there was a three-way tie in the voting, and extra rounds had to be run to pick the final top three in order.

The winning artwork was of a pair of Ruddy Ducks painted in acrylic by Jennifer Miller of Olean, New York. (See her reproduced artwork above.) Coming in second was a flying Red-breasted Merganser by Ron Louque of Charlottesville,Virginia, and third was a Canada Goose by Frank Mittelstadt of Beaver Dam, Wisconsin.

You can find more on the results of the contest at the Federal Duck Stamp Office website.

Jennifer Miller, the artist for the winning image with the Ruddy Ducks has been known for her fantasy artwork, yet she is currently creating wildlife artworks, jewelry, masks, and sculpture as well.

Describing her outdoor as well as artistic interests, Miller says, “I grew up with a very vivid imagination, and couldn’t stop drawing birds and dragons. I am mostly self-taught, with no formal art education, and studied under the guidance of the natural world… I draw a lot of inspiration from the land around me! I have what others have referred to as an ‘explosive’ passion for nature and wildlife, and indeed I go out of my way daily to study, observe, and learn about my interests. I am equally happy examining a wild bird through binoculars as I am examining bits of moss growing across a fallen tree.”

You can find out more about Miller and her work on her website.

Curiously, the gender of the artists making submissions to this contest was just over 80 percent male, and just under 20 percent female. Only two other women have come in first in the contest previously: Nancy Howe in 1990 (King Eider) and Sherrie Russell Meline in 2005 (Ross’s Goose).

Miller’s artwork with her pair of Ruddy Ducks will appear on to the 2015-2016 Migratory Bird Hunting and Conservation [Duck] Stamp. Individual stamps, of course, will be sold for $15 each, with almost all the proceeds – adding up to about $24 million per year – going directly to the Migratory Bird Conservation Fund (MBCF). This funding secures vital breeding, stopover, and wintering habitats for waterfowl, other bird species, and other wildlife across the National Wildlife Refuge System.

Today, parts of 252 National Wildlife Refuges (accounting for 2.37 million acres) and over 200 Waterfowl Production Areas (with over 3.0 million acres secured) owe their existence to the stamp investments made through the MBCF.

We in the Friends Group can think of no better – and more efficient – way to support wildlife habitat than the act of buying a federal stamp. Buy this year’s stamp, and when next year’s stamp showing the two Ruddy Ducks becomes available (at the end of June 2015) buy that one, too!

It’s simple. It’s inexpensive. It’s proven.

Prairie Kingsnake

Prairie Kingsnake by Kory Roberts

Prairie Kingsnake by Kory Roberts

Prairie Kingsnake (Lampropeltis calligaster) Photo by Kory Roberts

The Prairie Kingsnake is a nonvenomous snake living in the eastern third of Kansas southwest to the Red Hills. However, its range also includes Iowa, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas and Louisiana. It has dark splotches along its back that vary from gray to brown to reddish brown, each with black trim. These blotches float on a lighter tan field giving way to a white belly. It is distinguished from copperheads that have hourglass markings. It is immune to the venom produced by copperheads, cottonmouths and rattlesnakes. During the summer it is nocturnal, preferring to spend the day under rocks and in burrows. During the spring and fall it may be observed during the morning or early evening (diurnal). It prowls for small rodents and other small mammals, certain snakes (even venomous ones), lizards and frogs that it overcomes by coiling around, constricting and suffocating. Around farmlands it keeps mice under control although some are killed by people ignorant of their nonvenomous and even docile nature.

SINO: The Latest, Gravest Threat to American Sportsmen

By Bob Marshall

Field and Stream

–>

That would be the “Sportsmen in Name Only” – those hundreds of politicians you keep sending to Congress who claim to love you, but betray you when it suits them. And they struck again this week.

SINOs continually attack almost every national program critical to outdoor sports. Their targets have included Farm Bill conservation programs, wilderness and roadless designations, sensible regulations on oil, gas, mining, grazing and timbering operations on public lands, almost every budget that enhances fish and wildlife.

On September 9, SINOs in the House (262 Republicans, 35 Democrats) passed a bill that would prevent the Obama Administration – and any that follows it to the White House – from restoring some of the wetlands protections the Supreme Court removed nearly 10 years ago.

Since 1972, the Clean Water Act has provided protection for wetlands. Congress wisely agreed these habitats served such a vital role to a healthy environment that they should be considered part of the public trust. Included in those protections were lands that might be wet only part of the year or were distant from navigable waterways. There was enough science to show that, while temporary or isolated, these wetlands served a vital function for fish, wildlife and entire watersheds.

Among other things, that decision meant the stream banks critical to trout populations could not be ripped apart by development, and the prairie pothole nesting grounds that keep waterfowl populations large enough for hunting, could not be drained.

For 30 years, those protections helped fish and wildlife populations, while American agriculture and development prospered. The number of millionaires skyrocketed, cities expanded, bread and breakfast cereals crowded supermarket shelves.

But in 2001 and again in 2006, developers and agriculture concerns said they wanted that slim slice of America’s public trust back in private hands. They convinced the Supreme Court that the 1972 Congress never intended the Clean Water Act to protect those types of wetlands, that the policy was a horrible burden on their wallets.

The court didn’t rule these wetlands should not be protected. It simply ruled the law had been misinterpreted. At the same time it gave various interpretations of what could be included as protected wetlands, leaving regulatory confusion in its wake.

So, 20 million acres of wetlands that had been protected for 30 years were now exposed to ruin – and federal agencies were unclear just what should be protected.

A solution to the court’s action was obvious: Congress could pass a law saying these temporary and isolated wetlands should be protected. Sportsmen’s groups across the nation supported that move, including Ducks Unlimited and Trout Unlimited.

Then the SINOs struck. They killed any measure trying to work its way through the House or the Senate.

Sportsmen finally found a friend in the White House when the Obama Administration ordered the EPA to draw up a new definition of what could be regulated. The result wasn’t a perfect gift to sportsmen: While it would restore almost all protections to stream sides, it would leave the potholes at the mercy of case-by-case decisions by local offices of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Sportsmen’s groups hailed the action, and DU pledged to make its case with science that the potholes should be included.

The SINOS – those politicians who attend your DU and TU banquets, and swear how much they love hunters and angers – were not happy.

Some farm and development lobbies are using SINOs as their mouthpieces crying the rule imposes new restrictions, or is a “land grab.” Nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, the new rule leaves out some wetlands that once were protected!

But one thing is clear: This latest attack strips the SINOs of their “I-Love-Sportsmen” camo pattern. That’s because they know the bill has no chance in the Senate. And they know President Obama has promised a veto if it makes it to his desk. And they all received a letter signed by almost every sportsman’s group in the nation as well as fishing and hunting gear manufacturers,
http://www.nwf.org/News-and-Magazines/Media-Center/News-by-Topic/Wildlife/2014/09-09-14-Sportsmens-groups-industry-oppose-House-bill-to-undermine-Americas-clean-water.aspx urging them to stand down. But they passed the bill anyway as part of an election-year campaign to provide shouting-points in tight elections.

That’s what makes this latest SINO attack especially craven. They were pandering to the forces that oppose vital sportsmen’s interests. Once again they were throwing sportsmen under the bus to gain points with another group.

So check the vote. If your House member voted “Yea” on H.R. 5078, he or she is a SINO – Sportsman In Name Only.

Meanwhile, sportsmen should take their own action to outflank the SINOs. The proposed rule is open to public comment through Oct. 20. You can do your part in a few minutes online. http://www.regulations.gov/#!submitComment;D=EPA-HQ-OW-2011-0880-0001

Editor’s Note: In Kansas, Representatives Jenkins, Huelskamp, Pompeo and Yoder all voted “Yea” on H.R. 5078. Additionally, Representatives Huelskamp and Pompeo were among the 120 co-sponsors of H.R. 5078.

Sportsmen’s groups take issue with wetlands bill

By Dave Golowenski

The Columbus (Ohio) Dispatch

A large number of sportsmen’s organizations voiced opposition to the Republican-backed United States Regulatory Overreach Protection Act, which passed the U.S. House of Representatives last week along party lines.

The bill would restrict the rule-making ability of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers in determining whether millions of acres of wetlands and thousands of miles of headwater streams earn protection under the Clean Water Act.

The bill “is a vote against America’s sportsmen and women who depend on wetlands and headwater streams to provide the highest quality fishing and hunting opportunities,” said Steve Moyer, Trout Unlimited’s vice president of government affairs.

The waters in play, a Trout Unlimited statement said, include “seasonally flowing intermittent and ephemeral streams and certain ‘Isolated’ wetlands.” The prairie potholes, on which waterfowl, including ducks, depend for breeding, would lose federal protection under the House-passed bill.

The bill’s backers maintain federal authority should not extend to such waters.

Groups opposing the law, which President Barack Obama said he will veto if it passes the Senate, include the National Wildlife Federation, the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership and the American Fly Fishing Trade Association, B.A.S.S., Bull Moose Sportsmen’s Alliance, Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, The Berkley Conservation Institute, The International Federation of Fly Fishers, The Snook and Gamefish Foundation, The North American Grouse Partnership, the American Fisheries Society and the Izaak Walton League of America.

Friends of Squaw Creek National Wildlife Refuge announces Volunteer Opportunities!

Fall 2014 Schedule

Friends of Squaw Creek is seeking volunteers

for its nature shop at Squaw Creek National Wildlife Refuge.

Weekdays in November from 10 AM to 4 PM; and,

Weekends from October 18th through December 7th from 9 AM to 4 PM.

 

You may ask, “What will I do?”

Greet our visitors and share your excitement for the refuge.

Answer questions about our refuge to those who call

Ring up sales for our nature shop.

 

You may ask, “How much of my time is needed?”

One Saturday or Sunday from 9:00 AM to 4:00 PM

October 18 through December 7 during peak migration

Or a weekday during November from 10:00 AM to 4:00 PM

When Burroughs Audubon adopted Squaw Creek National Wildlife Refuge, it knew it was taking part in the protection of 7,350 acres of wetland, forest, and grassland for hundreds of species of migrant birds. Your volunteer hours for Friends of Squaw Creek aids in the management of this wonderful habitat that is an Important Bird Area (IBA.) We are grateful.

Snow on the mountain: a Kansas beauty that is also dangerous

By Elby Adamson
Bumble Bee on Thistle

Bumble Bee on Thistle

Bumble Bee on Thistle

Bumble Bee on Thistle

In late summer and early fall nature’s pallet in Kansas contains the beauty of purple thistles, yellow sunflowers and a plant commonly called snow-on-the-mountain.
 
Dry conditions over much of the state in early summer have suppressed this last plants growth this year but it is still showy in spots filling waste areas, roadside ditches and over-grazed pastures with drifts of white.  While this weed may be beautiful, Snow-on-the-mountain is masquerading. It can be dangerous and some authorities say it can be deadly to cattle if consumed in large quantities dried in hay.
Snow on the Mountain

Snow on the Mountain

 
 
Technically, this plant isEuphorbia marginata and it is a relative of the poinsettias that are popular potted plants at Christmas time. Like the poinsettia, the beauty of Snow-on-the-mountain is not from its undersized flowers, but rather from the bracts, the modified leaves that surround the flowers.
Snow on the Mountain

Snow on the Mountain

 
Bracts are specialized leaves that surround the flowers and in the case of both Snow-on-the-mountain and poinsettias may through bright, colorful appearance attract pollinating insects to the flowers.
 
As with many members of the Euphorbia family including spurges and the poinsettia, Snow-on-the –mountain contains a milky sap that can cause an allergic reaction much like that of poison ivy in some people. The sap is said to be especially irritating to mucous membranes and the eyes.
 
Yet, in some parts of the eastern U.S., the plant is grown as an ornamental in spite of its less desirable qualities.
 
 It should not be confused with another plant, Bishop’s weed or Goutweed that is sometimes also called Snow-on-the-mountain.  That plant– Aegopodium podagraria ‘Variegatum’– is a member of the Parsley family and is often used as a ground cover especially in shady areas.
 
In Kansas Snow-on-the-mountain is usually considered a nuisance plant and when it is in pastures, cattle won’t eat it because of a bitter taste and the irritation from the sap. Farmers and ranchers often spray it with herbicides to control its tendency to spread profusely.
 
Snow-on-the-mountain flourishes in sun and tolerates heat and dry conditions very well, but caution should be taken if you rashly pick it for a wildflower bouquet or decide to plant it as an ornamental in the flowerbed.
 
All photos by the author