Monthly Archives: April 2015

Avoid landscaping with invasive tree species

Homeowners can help conservation by wisely choosing native trees and shrubs to plant this spring. Missouri Department of Conservation (MDC) foresters suggest that native trees can provide showy blooms in spring while also boosting butterflies and wildlife. Non-native trees are generally less beneficial, and some oft-planted ornamentals, such as Bradford pear, have become invasive and harmful to natural areas.

Downy serviceberry is an early blooming native tree that grows well in ornamental settings. Serviceberry is covered with white flowers in early April. The trees grow well in home landscape plantings and produce red berries that are edible by birds and people, said Wendy Sangster, MDC urban forester.

Other native choices include dogwood, yellowwood, redbud, blackhaw viburnum, hophornbeam and chokecherry. The venerable redbud tree blushes with lavish lavender flowers in spring, grows quickly and provides shade. Wild plum provides delicate white flowers for yards where a small tree fits landscape design. Dogwood trees, an Ozark native with classic four-petal white flowers, will grow in Kansas City if planted in partial shade.

Native plants and trees are a desirable part of nature’s food chain that attracts watchable wildlife. Insects evolved with natives. Those insects, such as butterfly caterpillars, provide food for birds. A native tree is essentially a living, summer time, backyard bird feeder.

Non-native trees support far fewer insects. But they also pose problems for wild areas valued for native plants on private and public lands. Bradford pears, for example, have been often planted as ornamentals in the past because they provide white blooms in spring and experts formerly considered them safe. They are hybrids and it was believed they could not produce viable seed. But a varied mix of cultivars allowed some Bradford pears to cross pollinate and produce viable seed. Those seeds are spread by birds into natural areas. Bradford pears are a Callery pear cultivar. The cultivars from Asia compete well because they leaf out early and crowds out valuable native species. Bradford pears are also poor landscaping choices because they are not strong and limbs break easily in storms, Sangster said.

MDC offers information about home landscape trees that help people and wildlife at http://www.mdc.mo.gov/discover-nature/trees-work.

The Heartland Tree Alliance, an MDC partner, provides information about trees that do well in the Kansas City area at https://www.bridgingthegap.org/heartland-tree-alliance. A useful source for information about native wildflowers, grasses, shrubs and trees is available at http://www.grownative.org.

The right tree in the right place is important because trees provide shade, clean air and wildlife habitat, Sangster said. Extra care in planting trees keeps both the urban forest and wild lands healthy.

Editor’s note: Foresters from the Missouri Department of Conservation (MDC) suggest that native trees can provide ample attractive blooms in spring while also attracting butterflies and bird species, but to avoid planting non-native trees such as Bradford pear that have become invasive and harmful to natural areas.

Find a funky nest near you!

Contest showcases unusual bird nesting sites

Spring is nesting season and some birds have a flair for the funky when it comes to finding the right real estate to lay their eggs and raise their chicks. The annual “Funky Nests in Funky Places” contest hosted by the Celebrate Urban Birds project at the Cornell Lab of Ornithology is underway. Look for another entertaining collection of nests in old boots, barbecue grills, motorcycle helmets, traffic signals, rakes, old tires and who-knows-what.

Participants may send in a photo, video, story, poem, or even some form of dance or artwork. Entries may be submitted in categories such as “cutest,” “funniest,” “funkiest,” or “most inconvenient.” Celebrate Urban Birds is offering a free, downloadable flyer showing some of the places you can look for funky nests in urban locations.

“Even in urban areas, we’re a lot closer to birds than you might think,” says project leader Karen Purcell. “This contest is a lot of fun but it’s also about really being aware of what’s around you and taking the time to appreciate birds and all of nature.”

The deadline for entries is June 15.

Participants should read the guidelines for approaching nests to be sure the birds are not disturbed in any way.

Contest prizes include a mini-iPad, binoculars, Pennington bird feeders, Inside Birding DVDs, Diversity of Animal Sounds CDs, beautiful posters, field guides, and much more.

To learn more about how to participate, plus terms and conditions, visit FunkyNests.org.

Celebrate Urban Birds is a free, year-round citizen-science project focused on birds in neighborhood settings.

Leading Sage-Grouse scientists advise Secretaries Jewell and Vilsack that heightened protections are needed for Greater Sage-Grouse

Clait E. Braun, Ph.D., John W. (“Jack”) Connelly, Ph.D., and nine other leading sage-grouse scientists sent a letter March 12, 2015 to Secretaries Jewell and Vilsack noting that current sage-grouse conservation measures in the draft agency conservation plans inconsistently apply the best available scientific information on greater sage-grouse, and will not adequately protect greater sage-grouse from further decline.

These scientists expressed concern that the Departments of Interior and Agriculture are “abandoning science-based conservation measures . . . in favor of more elastic, subjective measures.”  In particular, the scientists warned that the agencies’ conservation measures regarding mining and minerals management, livestock grazing, vegetation treatments, prescribed fires, and the calculation of the overall disturbance footprint were inadequate to protect sage-grouse populations and habitat.

The scientists concluded, “[w]e support the federal planning process and are prepared to assist your Departments in developing measures to conserve and recover greater sage-grouse, but federal planners must commit to science-based planning to achieve this goal.”

The letter http://www.westernwatersheds.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Jewel-Vilsack-Scientist-letter-3.12.15.pdf was signed by William L. Baker, Ph.D. (Laramie, Wyoming), Jeffrey L. Beck, Ph.D. (Laramie, Wyoming), Clait E. Braun, Ph.D. (Tucson, Arizona), John W. Connelly, Ph.D. (Blackfoot, Idaho), Lester D. Flake, Ph.D. (Springville, Utah), Edward O. Garton, Ph.D. (Moscow, Idaho), Robert Gibson, Ph.D. (Lincoln, Nebraska), Matt Holloran, Ph.D. (Fort Collins, Colorado), Kent C. Jensen, Ph.D. (Volga, South Dakota), Kerry P. Reese, Ph.D. (Moscow, Idaho), and E. Thomas Rinkes (Boise, Idaho).

114 Sportsmen’s groups call on Congress to reject all efforts to sell or transfer public lands

More than 100 hunting, fishing, and conservation organizations, including the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership, the National Wild Turkey Federation, Pheasants Forever, Quail Forever, Trout Unlimited, Dallas Safari Club, Pope & Young Club, the American Fly Fishing Trade Association, and more than 80 state-based groups, have released a letter to local and national decision-makers opposing the sale or transfer of federally-managed public lands. Recipients include House members meeting tomorrow to discuss federal land acquisition, and its impacts on communities and the environment, and Senators who recently passed a budget resolution that could encourage the sale or transfer of public lands.

“We’re calling on lawmakers to end this conversation now,” says Whit Fosburgh, TRCP’s president and CEO, whose recent blog post addressed the Senate amendment, which passed 51-49 on March 26. “Nothing galvanizes sportsmen like the loss of access for hunting and fishing, and continuing to indulge this controversial idea is keeping us from the real task of managing our public lands.”

America’s 640 million acres of federal public lands—including our national forests and Bureau of Land Management lands—provide hunting and fishing opportunities to millions of sportsmen and women. Since late last year, efforts to wrest public lands from the federal government and put them under state ownership have been matched by the unanimous outcry of sportsmen across the country. “Decision-makers need to know what they are stepping into,” says Joel Webster, director of western public lands for the TRCP. “Over 72% of western hunters depend on public lands for access, and sportsmen are not going to stand idly by as they’re sold away.”

Sportsmen from across the West are speaking out on this pivotal issue:

In Arizona: “Can you imagine driving up to the Kaibab National Forest, home to world-class elk and mule deer habitat, only to be greeted by ‘road closed’ signs, indicating that the new uranium company owners have prohibited entry?” asks Tom Mackin, president of the Arizona Wildlife Federation. “Such a scenario absolutely could occur if the transfer of public lands gives Arizona the opportunity to sell or lease this former National Forest to the highest bidder.”

In Colorado: “Desert and Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep rely almost exclusively on federally managed public lands for habitat,” says Terry Meyers, president of the Rocky Mountain Bighorn Society. “It’s hard to imagine any good coming from the sale or transfer of these lands, especially for a sensitive species like bighorns.”

In Idaho: “Almost every Idaho hunter and fisherman relies on public lands for their recreation, whether they’re pursuing elk in the Lemhis, mule deer near Bear Lake, chukars in the Owyhees, or steelhead on the Clearwater,” says Tad Sherman, president of the Idaho State Bowhunters, which, with its affiliated clubs, represents more than 5,000 Idaho sportsmen. “Idaho without public lands is not the Idaho that should be passed on to future generations. It’s time to end the discussion of transferring or selling America’s public lands legacy.

In Montana: “Decision makers are toying with our Western way of life,” says Tony Jones, president of Ravalli County Fish and Wildlife Association. “Sportsmen see those who want to take away our public lands no differently than those who want to take away our guns. This bad idea will not be tolerated.”

In Nevada: “I choose to live in Nevada specifically to enjoy access to its vast unspoiled public lands that are at the very heart of our Western heritage and way of life,” says Larry Johnson, president of the Coalition for Nevada’s Wildlife. “If transferred to the state, Nevada would go bankrupt trying to manage these lands without selling off the best. This would seriously impact all of us who thrive on outdoor recreation.”

In Oregon: “The loss of access to public lands has a negative effect on Oregon’s $2.5-billion outdoor industry, one that is a leader in Oregon’s economy,” says Ty Stubblefield, field administrator for Oregon Hunters Association. “We simply cannot afford to lose our public lands.”

In Utah: “Here and throughout the western states, federal public lands are the lifeblood of our American sporting traditions,” says Ernie Perkins with the Utah Chukar and Wildlife Foundation. “The proposal to transfer or sell these lands has to be one of the worst ideas to surface in America in my lifetime.”

In Wyoming: “The move by some of our decision makers to transfer or sell off federal public lands is an insult to the birthright of all Americans,” says Josh Coursey, president and CEO of the Muley Fanatics Foundation. “Not only do Wyoming’s public lands, like the Shoshone National Forest, provide suitable habitat for fish and wildlife and critical access for sportsmen and wildlife enthusiasts, but these places also provide economic balance to local communities, where visitors pour in to spend time hunting for elk, fishing our blue-ribbon trout streams, or simply enjoying wildlife in these splendid places.”

If you agree with our message, please visit www.sportsmensaccess.org and sign the petition or share the website through your social media channels.

Tell BP: Wildlife STILL suffering, restore the Gulf!

 

It’s time for BP to restore sensitive Gulf habitat damaged from their oil spill

If you believe BP’s recent PR, wildlife in the Gulf of Mexico are doing just fine. Better than before. The Gulf is restored!

But we know wildlife habitat in the Gulf is still severely damaged from the BP oil spill and the creatures living there are suffering—and BP should not be allowed to pretend otherwise.

Tell BP to stop its campaign of denial and deception, and pay for restoration of the damaged ecosystems that Gulf wildlife depend on.

Five years after BP’s Deepwater Horizon rig exploded and spewed millions of barrels of toxic oil into the Gulf of Mexico, wildlife are struggling. Dolphins are dying at four times a normal death rate. TONS of oil is still being buried or washing up on Gulf beaches. BP’s recent report claiming the Deepwater Horizon accident—the largest marine oil spill in U.S. history—had no “significant long-term impact to the population of any Gulf species” is not only premature, it’s false.

Don’t let BP off the hook. Demand that BP take FULL responsibility for its negligence.

In the National Wildlife Federation’s recent report, Five Years and Counting: Gulf Wildlife in the Aftermath of the Deepwater Horizon Disaster,” they studied 20 types of wildlife that depend on a healthy Gulf for their survival. What they found is mounting evidence of ongoing damage to wildlife.

Wildlife will feel this spill for decades. This is STILL unfolding.

Bottlenose dolphins in Louisiana’s Barataria Bay are sick—very sick. They have symptoms of oil exposure—unusual lung masses, adrenal gland problems, even teeth that are falling out.

A 25,000-pound tar mat was just removed from the Gulf coastline. After the clean up, nearby tar balls were hard, thick and difficult to break. The insides were rubbery and sticky, and they smelled like asphalt. These materials are not just on the shore’s surface, they’re also buried in the sand and sediment.

Cat Island, formerly a lush habitat for wildlife, is a skeleton. Once a vibrant nesting island covered in brown pelicans, roseate spoonbills, terns and gulls, Cat Island is now just a small spit of mud.

If YOU believe BP should pay to restore wildlife habitat and stop pretending wildlife in the Gulf are better than ever, then please take action now.

https://online.nwf.org/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=2079&autologin=true&s_src=Affiliate_KansasWilldifeFederation

This disaster isn’t over for wildlife. Don’t let it be over for BP, either.

Thanks for all you do for wildlife.

Volunteers sought for Kansas state parks clean-up days

If you’re looking to gain volunteer service hours, want to give back to your community, or are just needing a good excuse to spend productive time outside, consider volunteering for one of the “Keep It Clean Kansas” events. Hosted by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE), Kansas Department of Wildlife, Parks and Tourism (KDWPT), and Westar Energy, the one-day events will consist of volunteers collecting trash and recyclable materials at one of five Kansas state parks from 8 a.m. to 11 a.m. in recognition of Earth Day.

The five state parks chosen for 2015 include: Cedar Bluff, El Dorado, Elk City, Lovewell, and Perry.

Volunteers are asked to preregister at www.kdheks.gov/waste/earthday.html. Trash sacks and gloves will be provided on location. Apart from the satisfaction of doing a good deed, volunteers can also enjoy a complimentary lunch and take home a commemorative event t-shirt.

For more information, or to register, visit www.kdheks.gov/waste/earthday.html.

Free entrance at Kansas state parks April 25

If you’re looking to gain volunteer service hours, want to give back to your community, or are just needing a good excuse to spend productive time outside, consider volunteering for one of the “Keep It Clean Kansas” events. Hosted by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE), Kansas Department of Wildlife, Parks and Tourism (KDWPT), and Westar Energy, the one-day events will consist of volunteers collecting trash and recyclable materials at one of five Kansas state parks from 8 a.m. to 11 a.m. in recognition of Earth Day.

The five state parks chosen for 2015 include: Cedar Bluff, El Dorado, Elk City, Lovewell, and Perry.

Volunteers are asked to preregister at www.kdheks.gov/waste/earthday.html. Trash sacks and gloves will be provided on location. Apart from the satisfaction of doing a good deed, volunteers can also enjoy a complimentary lunch and take home a commemorative event t-shirt.

For more information, or to register, visit www.kdheks.gov/waste/earthday.html.

Young wildlife rarely need “Saving”

Leave Wild Babies Wild!

 

You’re mowing your lawn when you notice something moving in the grass. You stop the mower and peer over to find it’s a nest of young rabbits, and the mother is nowhere in sight. Fear sets in that they may not make it through the night and you begin to devise a plan to “rescue” them. It’s a mistake that many well-intentioned people make, and unfortunately, it usually results in the premature death of the wildlife being “saved.”

The notion that a young animal found in the wild will die if not given care is wrong. In most cases, the mother is typically feeding nearby, keeping a distant eye on her offspring. Not only are most young found in the wild not abandoned, picking them up is against the law. The Kansas Department of Wildlife, Parks and Tourism and the Kansas Department of Health and Environment have regulations against such activity that can result in a fine up to $1,000 or more. In addition to legal repercussions, wild animals can pose a number of health risks, including diseases such as distemper, rabies, Lyme disease, roundworms, tapeworms, mites, and tularemia.

Additionally, if a “rescued” animal were to bite someone, it must be put to death and tested for diseases. Even if they don’t bite, the young usually fail to survive in captivity because most people are not equipped to handle wild animals, especially as they mature. On the off chance the animal does survive in captivity, it typically loses instincts that allow it to survive in the wild.

It is important to remember that although young wildlife may be cute, they belong in the wild. Wild animals cannot legally be inoculated by veterinarians, and few people really know how to care for them.

If you should see a young animal in the wild this spring or summer, observe at a distance and consider yourself lucky. But remember, just because they appear alone, that doesn’t mean they are abandoned.

If you really want to help, leave young in the wild where they were born and belong. 

If you find an injured animal, a list of licensed rehabilitators can be found at www.ksoutdoors.com, by clicking “Services/Rehabilitation.”

Special interest groups are trying to seize your public lands

America’s national forests, wildlife refuges, parks, and public lands are part of our national identity. That our public lands should be open to everyone to experience and enjoy is one of our nation’s proudest and most sacred traditions.

But this powerful American idea—defended by generations of bipartisan leaders—is under attack. In 11 western states (Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Montana, Washington, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and Wyoming), a coalition of special interest groups is lobbying state governments to seize America’s public lands so they can be privatized or auctioned for drilling, mining, and logging.

More recently, the idea of state take-over of our national lands has spread to Congress. In late March, the Senate approved a budget amendment (S.A. 838) that would facilitate the transfer or sale of national forests, wilderness areas and wildlife refuges to states. Also, a budget resolution in the House of Representatives (p. 119) expresses support for this idea: “The budget resolution supports reducing the Federal estate, and giving States and localities more control over the resources within their boundaries. This will lead to increased resource production and allow States and localities to take advantage of the benefits of increased economic activity.”

Both the Senate amendment and the House resolution speak to a broader agenda in this Congress to suppress Americans’ rights to access and enjoy the lands that belong to all of us—whether we live in Maine, Montana, or Mississippi.

This radical notion of locking up public lands—including forest lands and Bureau of Land Management lands where Americans love to hike, camp, hunt and fish—would reduce the freedom to access these lands for all of us, including our children and grandchildren. Ultimately, this effort could sacrifice our most treasured parks, wilderness, and national monuments, we may find ‘no trespassing’ signs and barricades instead of open trails and scenic views.

Sign the petition: Keep public lands in public hands.

The costs of public land seizures

  • Loss of recreational access to all Americans: Once lands are seized by states, they may be sold off to private interests to develop for oil and gas, mining or other development. Americans from all states could lose the ability to hike, camp, fish or hunt in some of their favorite wild places.
  • Potential development of prized wildlands: To pay the costs of upkeep, fighting wildfires and balancing their budgets, state governments would have to raise taxes or sell off iconic national treasures to the highest bidder—meaning they become privatized and access to these once-shared lands will no longer exist.
  • Burdens for state taxpayers: Forcing Western states to bear the costs of managing America’s national forests, parks, and public lands would place an extreme financial burden on Western taxpayers.
  • Potential damage to other state programs: Critical services like K-12 education or law enforcement would suffer cutbacks to help pay for the new fiscal burden of managing millions of acres of public lands on state coffers.

We’ve seen this idea before, in the “sagebrush rebellions” of the 1970s and 1980s. It was a bad idea then and it’s still a bad idea today.  Proponents of public lands seizures are conveniently silent on how they would pay for the costs of managing these national treasures, but the impacts of these proposals are clear and devastating for every American household.

The value of public lands to all Americans

At The Wilderness Society, we know that the American people reject these proposals. They are appalled by these types of attacks on nationally-treasured lands.

Americans overwhelmingly recognize the value of our shared parks, forests, and wild spaces for recreation, wildlife habitat, scenic wonder, hunting and fishing opportunities, the clean water they provide to millions of households, and for their economic importance to nearby gateway communities.

Quality of life is directly connected to access to public lands in the West. During the last four decades western non-metro counties with more than 30 percent protected public land increased jobs four times faster than non-metro counties with no protected public lands.

These lands are your lands

A September 2014 poll found that 72 percent of voters said they consider public lands to be “American places that belong to everyone in our country” vs. places that belong more to residents of the states where those lands are found. A similar poll conducted in February by Colorado College found similar results: by more than 2:1, voters in 6 of the interior western states agree that public lands belong to all Americans, not just residents of a particular state.

We want you to be informed, whether you live in Alaska or Arkansas, Wisconsin or Wyoming. You own these lands. They have been set aside for you and your family—to experience freedom, find respite in nature, learn about our history, and pass these wonders on to future generations of Americans. Let’s not allow short-sighted special interests steal that legacy from all of us, or from our children and grandchildren.

The 21st Annual Earth Day is April 22, 2015 !

By Ted Beringer

Sacramento Earth Day Logo by Dana Gray

Sacramento Earth Day Logo by Dana Gray

      The founding of Earth Day is attributed to Wisconsin Senator Gaylord Nelson.  In 1963 he convinced President John F. Kennedy to tour the country speaking about environmental issues. There slowly ensued widespread grassroots support that ignited in 1969 & 1970 culminating with the birth of Earth Day that began as a teach-in about environmental issues on April 22, 1970.

A month earlier peace activist John McConnell had proposed that a day be set aside to honor the Earth on the vernal equinox (March 21st) 1970. The United Nations sanctioned that proposal.

The Earth Day flag created by John McConnell

The Earth Day flag created by John McConnell

It is widely believed that grass roots support for the first Earth Day gave impetus to subsequent landmark legislation including the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act & the Endangered Species Act. It may surprise some that Gaylord Nelson was also a small business advocate. But his love of nature is how many will remember him. Although Earth Day, 2015, is April 22nd, various communities may celebrate it on slightly different days.

To learn more about activities on Earth Day in Kansas, Missouri and our Nation’s Capital, visit the following links:

Earth Day Network:

http://www.earthday.org/2015

Earth Day Celebration at Deanna Rose Children’s Farmstead, April 18th:

http://www.opkansas.org/events/earth-day-2/

Earth Day at the Missouri State Capitol, April 24th:

http://dnr.mo.gov/earthday/

Earth Day Concert on the National Mall

http://wtop.com/entertainment/2015/04/stars-align-for-earth-day-concert-on-national-mall/slide/1/